* All SEARCH

sponsors

Video

Mark Forsyth of SkillFRIDGE and David Dunn from lead sponsor Toshiba talk about the importance of SkillFRIDGE.

Read more

R32 could be a viable replacement for R410A

Published: 14 August 2012 - 00:00
USA: The flammable refrigerant R32 could be an attractive low-GWP solution for mainstream air-conditioning and heat pump applications with performance comparable to R410A, according to latest research.
The research carried out by Hung Pham and Rajan Rajendran of Emerson Climate Technologies evaluated the potential for the mildly flammable, A2L-rated, R32 and the HFOs 1234yf and 1234ze in air conditioning systems. It came out in favour of R32 in terms of both efficiency and cost as a suitable replacement for R410A.

R32 has theoretically 3-14% higher capacity in the air conditioning evaporating operating range (45-55°F) and 7-16% higher capacity in the heat pump evaporating operating range (-10° - 30°F). Correspondingly, R32 has theoretically -1% to +5% higher EER in the air conditioning cooling operating range and 0% to 7% higher EER in the heat pump heating operating range.

In practical drop-in tests in R410A systems, the actual relative compressor capacity was seen to have on average about 3-4% lower than theoretical the actual relative compressor EER was on average about 2-3% lower than theoretical due to lower overall isentropic efficiency.

The authors point out, however, that these tests were conducted using an R410A optimized compressor and not a R32 optimized product. Optimizing the compressor and system for R32 could push the refrigerant towards achieving its theoretical potential as well as mitigating its higher compressor discharge temperature.

The report states that the natural refrigerants CO2 and propane have so far have not shown to be cost-effective solutions for mainstream air conditioning due to their low efficiency and/or A3 flammability safety reasons. R290 is limited to much smaller units such as <1-ton mini splits where the charge can be limited closer to 150g that has become accepted as a standard without requiring secondary loop.

The authors maintain that R32 could serve as the initial candidate for new equipment to meet any potential HFC phase down proposal for at least until 2020+.

The HFO's, however are hampered by their relatively high costs but no visible advantages over R32 were observed in these early drop-in system test results. The HFO blends are comparable to R32, but their use may be limited initially until their cost position becomes clearer, says the report.

http://www.emersonclimate.com/en-us/Documents/R32_and_HFOs_as_Low-GWP_Ref_for_AC.pdf

Comments

13 September 2016 18:55:10
Daniel Renfrow

  I've never understood that if we are looking for more efficiencies then why aren't we employing watercooled condensers everywhere as we had in the 50's and 60's.    H2O has 970 btu per pound isentropic efficiency.    This would certainly help supliment the overall efficiency of a system.

03 December 2015 15:38:44
Frank

We are manufacturers of a Hydrocarbon refrigerants we can replace most refrigerants with greater performance we are 20-25% more efficient then any refrigerants, also reduce moisture up to 30%. 

03 January 2015 03:13:08
Kiran Shrestha

Could you send me cost analysis to prove that R32 is cost effective compared to R410A

 

Published prior to March 2014
By Michael Johns
There does not appear to be any comment or discuss with regard to the toxicity of R32 should it touched or inhale oor swallowed. It appears to be quite nasty stuff if it leaks out.
Published prior to March 2014
By Max From Maxwell HVAC
I'm totally with the hydro carbon refrigerants. I've been using EF-22a in all my jobs. The stuff is great.Much cheaper than R22 and great results.
Already Registered?
Sign In
Not Yet Registered?
Register
Printable View E-mail Bookmark