ACR-News
Know what you want? Try our 'Supplier Directory' 

Climategate 2 - the saga continues........

Hilarious reading this week on the web and in our papers about the fiasco of the redrawn map of Greenland. The Times Comprehensive Atlas of the World has been updated and in the brain-washing, never mind the facts here's the b***ocks style to which we've all become so accustomed in recent years on the subject of climate change, they decided to draw Greenland with much of the permanent ice sheet missing and claiming that this has now disappeared because of man made global warming. The publicity at the launch suggested that 15% of the Greenland ice sheet had become "green and ice free".

Proper scientists quickly pointed out the error of their assumptions and once the story broke - amazingly by the normally ultra pc, green broadcaster, the BBC - the blogosphere went ballastic again with people even suggesting the atlas compilers simply look at Google Earth! The Scott Polar Research Institute at Cambridge University have pointed out that large tracts of land shown in the atlas to be ice free have been seen in recent satellite imagery as clearly ice covered - and let's not forget this is at the end of the Summer months when the ice coverage is always at its lowest point!

"Never let the truth get in the way of the message" seems to be the mantra. You'd have thought after the scandal in 2009, where the leaked emails showed how the Climate Research Unit at East Anglia University was manipulating data to suit their political aims, that even the most ardent climate change fanatics would be more careful about how they try to get their message across. But no, it's clearly business as usual for these guys.

What worries me most though about this whole episode and the general green lobby method is the way the climate change message gets pushed continually into our sub-conscious. These fanatics have pervaded so many sections of society, particularly the public sector workforce, that you are still branded a heretic if you dare to question. The name "sceptic" has been used purely to try to brand anyone who doesn't believe in the public sector propaganda line. And it really is the whole public sector that's been tainted: Government at Westminster (right across the political spectrum - or at least what remains of the spectrum seeing as the spectrum of colours has become more of a hue!) pursues every green agenda with a religious zealotry, raising taxes directly and indirectly to make us pay for their beliefs; local Governments use the green arguments to justify cutting back on essential local services such as waste collection whilst increasing our council tax; BBC TV and Radio regularly trot out various people wanting to spout forth their green ideology without having anyone on air giving an alternate viewpoint - on the odd occasion when someone does give an alternate view they are invariably cut off or shouted down; schools teach our children opinion as if it were fact, resulting in those children growing up believing they were facts - nonsense of the sort that Al Gore shamefully propagated; the list is endless but this blog thankfully isn't!

Surely the green lobby has been so badly damaged again and again, whilst still not providing a shred of evidence of anthropogenic global warming, that our political classes must stop treating us like fools.

I believe absolutely and totally in climatic change. The evidence is clear that our planet has gone through a continuous cycle of climate change and that Earth looks very different from how it would have looked 50 or 150 million years ago. But ipso facto this surely points more and more towards climate change being a natural phenomena, not something we can control?
View User Profile for GraemeFox Graeme Fox is an RAC contractor based in Dundee. He is a director at AREA (Air Conditioning & Refrigeration European Contractors` Association) and a Fellow of the Institute of Refrigeration.
Posted by Graeme Fox 23 September 2011 14:47:01 Categories: Fox's Tales

Comments

By Big Al
23 September 2011 14:57:01
Seriously some in this industry are truly dumb! If you truly spend time looking at the science in detail and not follow some stupid right wing American christian agenda then you will see the damage being done to this planet. This is becoming an irrelevant discussion now as there is now big bucks in the green , Britain will again be left behind in this field if we follow these fools.
By Steve Smith
23 September 2011 14:56:01
A scientist who isn't sceptical is no scientist at all, only scientific method leads to fact. Rigorous and sceptical review supports truth and finds inconsistencies in poor method.
I consistently find only opinion on both sides of the climate change argument. I have only read a couple of web pages that attempted to methodically explain climate change and give supporting evidence.
Most spew forth brash opinion, as a religious leader might do with his flock, all lacking links to credible peer reviewed documentary evidence.
The issue for me is, the subject is tainted with 'belief' and the public are convinced into becoming part of one group or another, in order to escape from being a complete social outcast. All this based on no understanding of scientific fact.
Green opinion is being forced down our throats just as religious instruction is in our schools.
It's becoming a new global religion, with its own PC social witch hunts.
I personally 'believe' that we should endeavour to minimise our impact on our environment, regardless of climate change as a political instrument, but good decisions can only be made with reliable evidence and the reliability of the anthropogenic climate change evidence is as yet unconvincing, to me.
If you think you can convince me, show me clear simple method, with supporting evidence.
By Mark Cade
23 September 2011 14:55:01
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckton/

The same Viscount Christopher Monkton of Brenchley who falsely claimed to have won a Nobel Prize in 2007 and who BBC Four featured in their "Meet the climate sceptics" programme which highlighted his lack of scientific training and questionable views/mis-interpretations/mis-understandings.

I agree; People should not believe everything that is spewed out!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYVqRCVc7Q8&feature=related
By David. O
23 September 2011 14:54:01
Man-made Global Warming is a complete and utter sham and all the scientists that have been pushing this nonsense, for their own gains, will be brought to justice soon! People should not believe everything that is spewed out of the TV/newspapers (both Controlled media) and do their own research.

http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckton/

The 'Powers That WERE' have failed in their hell-bent attempt to bring about a World Government/Currency!!
By John S
23 September 2011 14:53:01
Graeme, nice to see that you consistently reveal your true colours through your blog. You have a healthy degree of skepticism which provides you with a air of credibility, but your blinkered view is conservative (with a small c) and you woudl have the industry continue in the way it always has.
Whilst the green lobby may be far from perfect and often ill informed, their environmental concerns should not be dismissed completely by you.
By Mark Cade
23 September 2011 14:52:01
The definition of a sceptic is a person inclined to question or doubt accepted opinions . Questioning or doubting isn t a bad thing, although discounting out of hand, as has happened here, is.
I do agree however that the green standpoint has been hijacked, in the same way health and safety was, to justify whatever agenda the user is trying to push.
35 errors were highlighted in Al Gore s An Inconvenient Truth , of which only 9 were seen as serious when taken before the High Court; he made more than 35 points in the film and therefore cannot be fully (or fairly) dismissed as shamefully propagating .
With regards there being not a shred of evidence of the anthropogenic contributions toward climate change (I accept that it is not 100% down to our emission but these are the variables we can control), then this to me can been discounted in a few simple steps:
1. Is the climate warming? Yes this is proven through ice core measurements, and even for England the CET shows an upward trend since the middle of the 17th century.
2. Does increased CO2 and other GHG concentrations thicken the atmosphere, trapping heat and subsequently raise the ambient temperature? Yes this has been proven by the works of Tyndall. Arrheius, Callendar, Keeling, etc.
3. Have we introduced more CO2 into the atmosphere? - Yes particularly from the industrial revolution (18th century) onwards.
Believer, non-believer, sceptic, fanatic, only the future will tell who s right. I for one don t want to be sat here in 50 years wishing I d done something when it was still possible and if I m wrong we get to prolong the reserves of fossil fuels by cutting how much we use. Not seeing a big downside.
Bottom line I don t agree with the green washing which is hijacking environmental issues, to support whatever agenda is flavour of the month, but I also don t agree with discounting out of hand without looking into it yourself.
By O. Deer.
23 September 2011 14:51:01
I was looking for some intelligent and informed debate on this subject, guess I'll have to look else where.
By John Orford
23 September 2011 14:50:01
I have to agree completely with you. A year or so ago I wrote basically an old man's rant on much this subject on our vehicle airconditioning information website http://www.airconditioningforcars.co.uk/ACpage06a.htm
It rambles on a bit but you may care to see it. The last part mentions global population - this is mentioned a lot these past few weeks but remeber I wrote this a year or so ago.
Keep up the good work, someone may be listening.
By Steve D
23 September 2011 14:49:01
I suspect the political agenda is to show they are "in control" to look as if they are doing something useful. Like they were "in control" of the economy when Gordon Brown was chancellor, making "adjustments to the tiller" to guide the good ship UK PLC through calm economic waters.
By Kenneth Duckett
23 September 2011 14:48:01
Maybe we can ease up a bit:

http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110516/full/news.2011.293.html
Comments are closed on this post.
ACR News is the number one magazine in the air conditioning and refrigeration industry. Don’t miss out, subscribe today!
Subcribe to ACR News

Diary

BESA National Conference